Inappropriate implementation in Downloads in Google Chrome on Windows prior to 140.0.7339.80 allowed a remote attacker to bypass Mark of the Web via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)

CSC Pay Mobile App 2.19.4 (fixed in version 2.20.0) contains a vulnerability allowing users to bypass payment authorization by disabling Bluetooth at a specific point during a transaction. This could result in unauthorized use of laundry services and potential financial loss.

The Qi Blocks WordPress plugin before 1.4 does not validate and escape some of its Countdown block options before outputting them back in a page/post where the block is embed, which could allow users with the contributor role and above to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks.

A DOM-based cross-site scripting vulnerability exists in electic-shop v1.0 (Bhabishya-123/E-commerce). The site's client-side JavaScript reads attacker-controlled input (for example, values derived from the URL or page fragment) and inserts it into the DOM via unsafe sinks (innerHTML/insertAdjacentHTML/document.write) without proper sanitization or context-aware encoding. An attacker can craft a malicious URL that, when opened by a victim, causes arbitrary JavaScript to execute in the victim's browser under the electic-shop origin.

In MISP before 2.5.28, app/View/Elements/Workflows/executionPath.ctp allows XSS in the workflow execution path.

Moodle PDF Annotator plugin v1.5 release 9 allows stored cross-site scripting (XSS) via the Public Comments feature. An attacker with a low-privileged account (e.g., Student) can inject arbitrary JavaScript payloads into a comment. When any other user (Student, Teacher, or Admin) views the annotated PDF, the payload is executed in their browser, leading to session hijacking, credential theft, or other attacker-controlled actions.

A stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the U2F Origin field of the Datacenter configuration in Proxmox Virtual Environment (PVE) 8.4 allows authenticated users to store malicious input. The payload is rendered unsafely in the Web UI and executed when viewed by other users, potentially leading to session hijacking or other attacks.

Client side access control bypass in the permission component in Devolutions Remote Desktop Manager on Windows. An authenticated user can exploit this flaw to bypass certain permission restrictions—specifically View Password, Edit Asset, and Edit Permissions by performing specific actions. This issue affects Remote Desktop Manager versions from 2025.1.24 through 2025.1.25, and all versions up to 2024.3.29.

ExaGrid EX10 6.3 - 7.0.1.P08 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control in the MailConfiguration API endpoint, where users with operator-level privileges can issue an HTTP request to retrieve SMTP credentials, including plaintext passwords.

A Clickjacking vulnerability exists in Rems' Employee Management System 1.0. This flaw allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript on the department.php page by injecting a malicious payload into the Department Name field under Add Department.

Silverpeas 6.4.2 contains a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the event management module. An authenticated user can upload a malicious SVG file as an event attachment, which, when viewed by an administrator, executes embedded JavaScript in the admin's session. This allows attackers to escalate privileges by creating a new administrator account. The vulnerability arises from insufficient sanitization of SVG files and weak CSRF protections.

Inappropriate implementation in DevTools in Google Chrome prior to 136.0.7103.59 allowed a remote attacker to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)

A clickjacking vulnerability could have been used to trick a user into leaking saved payment card details to a malicious page. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 139, Firefox ESR 128.11, Thunderbird 139, and Thunderbird 128.11.

GNU Mailman 2.1.39, as bundled in cPanel (and WHM), in certain external archiver configurations, allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands via shell metacharacters in an email Subject line. NOTE: multiple third parties report that they are unable to reproduce this, regardless of whether cPanel or WHM is used.

A weakness has been identified in FNKvision Y215 CCTV Camera 10.194.120.40. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file s1_rf_test_config of the component Telnet Sevice. Executing manipulation can lead to backdoor. The physical device can be targeted for the attack. This attack is characterized by high complexity. It is stated that the exploitability is difficult. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Snipe-IT before 8.3.4 allows stored XSS via the Locations "Country" field, enabling a low-privileged authenticated user to inject JavaScript that executes in another user's session.

The Qi Blocks WordPress plugin before 1.4 does not validate and escape some of its Counter block options before outputting them back in a page/post where the block is embed, which could allow users with the contributor role and above to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks.

Use after free in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 133.0.6943.53 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

The Structured Content (JSON-LD) #wpsc WordPress plugin before 1.7.0 does not validate and escape some of its block options before outputting them back in a page/post where the block is embed, which could allow users with the contributor role and above to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks.

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager, formerly Cisco SD-WAN vManage, could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to conduct a stored cross-site scripting attack (XSS) on an affected system.  This vulnerability is due to improper sanitization of user input to the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by submitting a malicious script through the interface. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to conduct a stored XSS attack on the affected system.